BlockedOutLights
Showing posts with label Chris Hipkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Hipkins. Show all posts

Saturday, December 9, 2023

Of Circus And Bread in the Daze of Chaos: An Open Letter the PM Luxon and the Right Honorable Chris Hipkins

Good day Gents:

Well, that was surely entertaining fellas!  This passing  election cycle , in which New Zealand  publicly voted  to  their deepening  silos of  political and social division ,  demonstrably by way of a triple-coalition government taking 43 calendar days to foment an agreement between a self-loathing right wing  Māori in David Seymour , a megalomaniacal, free-press hating, paleolithic political fossil in Winston Peters, and yourself, Prime Minister, an empty suit schooled in the primacy of  crony corporate Capitalism by way of your time as CEO with  Unliver in London,  Chi-town and  Toronto, eventually moving on to Air New Zealand  so that you could squash any racket  made about living  wage  amongst the front-line workers  of that world-renowned airline. Equally entertaining is the current slaughter of all Labour policies that the Coalition is embarking on- many of which were ineffective, unrealistic, or just plain window dressing. Addition by subtraction: the appearance of  progressive action and strength . It's great theatre, indeed, but is about as vital in substance as  candy floss. 

Nice work!

To The Right Honourable Hipkins, your leadership  was nothing short of complete milquetoast and  maladroit  ministry  that  you continued from your benefactor and predecessor Jacinda  Ardern, a pseudo social democrat.  Labour's impudence was in full effect for 6 years, and  did nothing that is worth really raving about policy-wise. You let the wolves in the parlour: giving access to  the monolithic  corporate criminal  syndicate of BlackRock to take root in Aotearoa. You let  affordable housing and low-income builds  throughout New Zealand slow to a crawl during Labour's  entire time in office, and demand has sharply risen, creating wait lists for people who are in desperate need of public housing.  Lack of public housing means  a steady increase in homeless Mr. Hipkins, lest you are unaware. 

Labour did little to help resettle migrants during and after CoViD, and were more than happy to send 'em back where they came from, rather than allow historical  access to MSD emergency benefits,  of which your party had actually sanctioned. Your agencies  placed in charge of the  temporary benefit program Manaaki Manuhiri, which was enacted for 3 months in 2020  ran through the Red Cross , with DIA Foreign Visitors Centre acting as the final line of  approval,  was land-mined with snipers  using vague requirements and rules that could be made ultra-flexible in context, giving room for harsh declination and rendering a  deliberately difficult path for redress and appeal . I know this personally, for as a migrant, I experienced this verbatim. Unlike a lot of my compatriots  who were dealt with the same way by DIA and had surrendered their fight,  I was able to traverse and battle through the slippery and unethical grievance process, being belittled,  bullied, disenfranchised  and overtly lied to by several agency  staff members employed by the DIA along the way . I ultimately won appeal on the very last day of the program -30th November. This  nearly two month fight led to mine being in arrears in rent, electric and water, aggravating my attempts in attaining  work after being laid off. 

That's not public assistance, Mr. Hipkins,  that's  game-playing political expediency rendering the facade of compassion for public consumption .  Ardern , yourself   and Labour did all you could to hide your disdain of migrants, as the party brought into the fable of there being  a vast expanse of able-bodied kiwis  ready, willing and available to step up and move the economy back into its pre-pandemic heights. Ardern's inability to acknowledge  the kiwi latitude and cultural antipathy toward work as a whole was sheer comedy. Out of all industrial nations worldwide,  New Zealand has the smallest average work week  , at 37 hours . It was migrants that drove New Zealand's GDP up through productivity and innovation in the preceding years. Post Covid, Labour did nothing to stop the  en masse  exodus of skilled labour  that occurred, whilst at the other end doing exactly zero meaningful  stewardship for a  talented migrant and skilled kiwi labour pool that had been forcibly returned to the island  from overseas during the pandemic. Only being moved to meaningful action by artifice  when  forced by petition did Labour's  inept immigration czar Kris Faafoi  allow amnesty for migrants caught in protocol and visa limbo hell, and a pathway to residency.


Labour was the party with the mandate in 2021, and did nothing but steady the ship after Covid, and made no true action on the coming onslaught  of exacerbated class inequality . A truly centrist government beholden to its core lobbyists and special interest and nothing more. Labour has learned nothing from its latent hue of policy mediocrity . The proof of its immense self-inflicted disability by the legacy of your party's  pseodo-progressive governance , is the very allowance of Labour  letting you lead the opposition against the same elected government you allowed to set Labour alight like  a cheap polyester shirt left in the dryer for too long.

Burnt ,shrunk , and left in the stench of  toxic melt. 

Now you cackle and crow in defiance of  PM Luxon and the Shutdown Twinz and their goonish languidity , oafish self-aggrandizement and empty , codified xenophobic hubris masquerading as a "strong government"  coalition. Your expansive verbiage and debate mastery to heckle these sallow henchmen you will impart, indeed. It will be the empty space you will inhabit in that liminal melancholy which  is most tragic, Mr. Hipkins. There was an opportunity you could have  fend off these dark arbiters that keep the middle and lower classes fighting amongst themselves , now entrenched into their silos for the next three years. You did  nothing.  Your pragmatic idling allowed the danger of mulit-national infiltrators of corporate hegemony to take root. You didn't rise to it.  They, the Corporate paranoids of the right,  after exposing your incredible lack of  street smarts,  punched you and Labour in the mouth, and sent you to the back of the bus. 

All  you can now do is cowl and virtue-signal as the minority in Parliament,  Labour reduced to  no more than a  theatre troupe vainly seeking an audience.

And you, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, now your coalition in full forward motion with the  anti-intellectual ACT and NZ First glitterati, a modular dysfunctional vehicle of  pure artifice if ever there was one. For many of us who remained slightly above a semi-conscious state during the electoral campaign recognize what it is you truly are in politics for...

Everyone who  looks like you, acts like you, and is monied like you. 

The real estate class, the property owners. The paper-chasing humanoids of the financial sector who are into  expanding  profit,  mass consumption of resources,  and personal gain at the expense and  death of people and cultures,   all while  nations burn to the ground. The 'WEF invitee class' who cannot wait to subjugate the lower classes and bring them to heal, all while telling them  what they can and cannot say. 

There's alot to unpack here..and  to unload on you.

First off: Your intent on banning gang patches, as if to suggest by merely covering up or removing  a piece of stitched insignia apparat ,you can eliminate the gangs themselves via  penalties, forfeitures and  the eschew  of other instruments of state-sponsored  fiduciary terrorism .  This act of censorship  (and it is censorship in its intent to quash free expression) not only is a core demonstration of your pervasive lack of imagination, but speaks firmly how you really view those who come from poverty, recidivism, domestic violence, homelessness, drug abuse, rape, failing and fading  resources, suppressed wages, stunted upward mobility  and higher death rates overall, and haven't any income source meaningful beyond interstate drug dealing and territorial control

They're all  just criminals. 

No longer human beings  in the vox populi campaign you ran as some kind of pseudo champion of the people  a la Donald Trump. They are merely animals that need to be interred at the zoo. This aligns with your current rush to remove te reo Māori from public services, publications and spaces forthwith.. It is  wanton dehumanizing  of  primarily ethnic groups  at both ends of this censorship spectrum:  on one end shutting  down free expression that is cauterized as socially and publicly   'offensive' and 'criminal', and at the other  end, diminishing indigenous language as  'unnecessary' and 'irrelevant',  relegating its cultural importance to general marginalization is obtusely authoritarian , and historically, a colonial act of deliberate cultural disenfranchisement . Native Americans, Aboriginals, Moriori, and countless other  native cultures have had their language stripped, were violently displaced and destroyed by European colonial conquest worldwide. During the Māori 'activation' protest which ascended on Wellington on 5 December , when asked about it by the press during your new government rollout, you claimed ignorance as to why they were protesting initially , reinstating the artifice of bringing together New Zealand as 'one people' What you meant was  white people, Prime Minister.

A nation strictly for  those who look like you, act like you, and are monied like you.

And you proudly represent the Professional Managerial Class. which excludes poor whites as well. Sure, you tailored your campaign to draw their vote , particularly in the rural areas and farming communities.  You made your prerequisite  pit stops and campaign stumps at areas  where  the working white  poor were made even poorer by natural disasters in the past year. What expresses contempt toward the most vulnerable is the very construct you and National's willingness to pull down and away the very benefits keeping them afloat. It's the politics of  class assault: dissolve the social compact,  shatter the windows of  the public space, revert the  monies and safety nets  so as to deliver back  to your compatriots  who are members of the global 1%. Your apparent  dream is  to hear champagne glasses clicking in the skyscraper penthouses and  salons of power,   whilst  down in the dirge and filth of the cities below,  law enforcement swarm and trap homeless families like sewer rats to carrion, as to be taken away, to incarceration, so as to disappear from your view, not to cause you discomfort as you partake in the festivities..

ACTs pronouncement about increasing the construction of prisons and  the relaxing of stringent gun laws further supports this divisive environment by creating a circus of distraction and violence among the classes, whilst the upper 10% continue profiting through  tax loopholes snuck through Parliament at the behest  of you donors., of which  Winston Peters is already in their back pockets, in putrid cynical fashion.

How to figure this assumption of  this being your intent as Prime Minister, Mr Luxon? I'm an American Kiwi. I have seen the result of the deliberate disleveraging  parlayed on my people, the working class poor. I watched my city , Los Angeles-  pummel 70, 000 people into the streets all across L.A. county proper , 40% of which are families .  Across freeway overpasses and footpaths littered with tents, hunger, police harassment , stress, bile and insomnia. At one time I was one of them: No games, Prime Minister,  you can read it here.and here . I haven't forgotten that feeling of being less-than,  being judged, and being criminalised for trying to recover from circumstances I did not create, but was created by a system of inequity used to benefit the upper 1%. No workers rights meant I lost not one, but two jobs without discernible reason. I was working an average of 60 hours a week to support my family, then, suddenly parsed public assistance that did not cover basic  living and breathing, then further down the line- eviction, then: out in the streets for the next 4 months.

I was defined  as a low life. A loser. A criminal.  Language your class uses to describe us  on the streets and shelters , living out of cars,  camper vans and  caravans, Mr. Luxon., the 'whiners' and 'losers' among us. I wonder how many homeless people that came across your purview that  you scoffed  at on your way to the office in Chicago. I wonder about the presence of your  fellow pasty-faced  American corporate homeboys  you rolled with who  barked  and bellowed about "these low-life niggers" running the streets on the south side.  

You have never  wont for anything, never been  destitute, and have had full access to upward mobility.  In that, I wonder what you would have done if you had been working  as a hotel  security agent in a  5 star luxury Hotel situated at the  landmark Hollywood and Vine intersection in the heart of  Tinsel Town at  2am  on a frothy and sleepy November eve,  , when a seeminigly  homeles man ,  self-proclaiming to be a Marine veteran who had just returned from Afghanistan rocks up,  his head fully consumed in  his  combat PTSD , in your establishment's  lobby with a .45 caliber pistol pressed firmly through the bottom of his empty backpack, begins arguing with front desk staff, and when you approach him to ask him what is going on, he  openly confers to you directly his  contemplation  of  murder-suicide of all those present  and you having no weapon on your person  except your wits.  Curious if you would managed to craftly and adeptly show compassion to the gentlemen, and talk him down, even though your terrified your one-off attempt might find you in a coffin,  or  would you defecate in  your trousers, say something blindingly impish with a  high squeal of terror at the top of your  larynx, and manage  to get yourself, and everyone on shift with you in  the somber early morning  some toe tags tied fitted to each of  your dead feet as your carted off in a meat wagon  to the morgue. Just another American Mass shooting statistic for the next news cycle.

It's a true story. I actually managed to get the poor bastard to put away his weapon and, after he verified his active duty status when he voluntarily presented his military ID card, I gave him  a hotline number to the very  veterans assistance which I had used myself when I ended up homeless. Being a vet myself, I understood the futration he felt  of feeling discarded and forgotten after my service. He was a combat marine: a trained killer who needed  deprogramming. I bring this forward not as braggadocio. The point is that the class you represent creates and manufactures conflict to covet more resources, materials and land for your collective enterprises globally. Your class kills us in large numbers through your wars of  corporate profit expansion. It is disgusting, Prime Minister Luxon, that you haven't any issue with being the custodian of the corporate monoliths  who want to eventually have  us all killed if we don't 'comply', and get out of their way.

You're not ignorant of this either, Prime Minister. You are fully aware of this in fact, and don't give a damn, and for the simplest of reasons.You don't have to.

Many New Zealand  voters missed this aspect of your progeny, including  your wealth being built on investment , particularly in property management and as a tenured CEO of multiple corporations. This  has solidified  your bias  of  advancing Capitalism to profit  from both personally, professionally as well as to benefit your  other corporate criminal  contemporaries in three-piece suits. You speak in the language of  'American gangster' capitalism , utilising the deceptive double-speak sloganeering of 'creating better outcomes  for New Zealanders through expanding business' , giving tax deferment  to Property managers and landlords which in itself solidifies inequality and corners the working poor, which you will further throw battery  acid on them  via oppressed wages and neuter any ability for workers to negotiate for better pay and elevation in  their status and station.

And you have gotten over so far, with the entirety of New Zealand 's news media (both state-run and independant) having  completely taken their eye off the ball and letting you off the hook, having  never challenged you on the fact the PMC you rep deliberately  contribute to divisive xenophobia , fear mongering, policy inversion, encouragement of  social violence  so as to use laws to curtail personal freedoms such as free speech and privacy.  You have essentially modeled your policies to be  textbook American policy via lobbyism from mulit-national corporations such as  BlackRock, Vanguard, the fossil fuel industry and Big Pharma. 

You don't care, Prime Minister. You just want a seat at that table. And another 3 , maybe four years in power to expand your CV and line your coffers and pockets . You don't have to care personally, as you know you are shielded from any consequences of your intended policies of pure rot and grift for the elites. They will aid in your protection from the rest of us.

There is one little problem for both of you, and for varying reasons of concern, gentlemen. Because of your collective self-interest, incompetence of progressive policy making and narcissism , you are bringing Aotearoa closer to the sunken place:  that  ride up to the edge of the waterfall of  ultra- violence ,  media and government  collusion in censorship and propaganda, militarised policing killing unarmed poor whites and people of color,  extreme  class inequality left over from Capitalism  which has left it a living graveyard of calcified institutions  enshrined and stained with the rust and filth of corruption, just like a place 11,000 kilometeres from our location....  


Can I  make it any clearer?

KC Shoen





Saturday, September 23, 2023

The 2023 General Election: Of Polity and Inequality

Neither Labour nor National can weather the coming onslaught of  corporate corruption and malfeasance as they both are keen to invite  foreign money to 'invest' in Aotearoa

KC SHOEN

The Plausible Scenario

Imagine as a  relatively small  nation of  5 million people, that the new incoming  government  elected this October has already  came into power and put forth a tough-on-crime policy for legislative approval.  Assume also that a coalition  plurality is strong enough in numbers for the prevailing party to support such intensive measures to become law. 

Fast forward about 3 years, and suddenly 15-20% of that 5 million are incarcerated under these new draconian 'anti-crime' measures. You notice not only that the conviction, sentencing  and  incarceration rates  skyrocketing simultaneously,  but the the knock-on effect of  prisons being built rise exponentially  so as to facilitate and warehouse these newly-minted criminals. Of the incarcerated, you note astutely, that  this expanded prison population  mostly consists of people of colour (pacifica & maori) who  make up about nearly 70%  of the dominant demographic, with lower/working class Pākehā making up nearly the  other 23-25%. As time gets on, and with these measures continued, you do note crime levels drop only slightly, except in two of the most critical  areas needed for continuing a stable & just society: high theft & burglaries and  violent crime, including mass shootings. You find that these are escalating at a harrowing rate unforeseen in New Zealand's history. They become more common,  more frequent,  and more destructive.

You notice that the the recidivism rates actually increased under the newer,  more harsh anti-crime measures. Domestic violence, suicide rates, drug use are all rising faster than in previous years.   In tandem to this excess, the  government rescinds  requirements  regarding the  levying of higher tax against corporations and the wealth accumulation of  affluent individuals, specifically in regard to capital gains tax and revenue profit taking, as an attempt to curry favorable consideration of foreign investment throughout the country. This attempt actually exasperates two major dynamics already  long-neglected in 2023: Corporate profit- taking driven  inflation,  which expanded class inequality via increased rentals and rent cost, health care, a steep rise in the rate of homelessness,  and adding further insult, the affluent class in New Zealand pays nearly no taxes, as  the general tax burden shifts downward to to the full-spectrum middle class to shoulder.  

As you live in one of New Zealand's five-largest cities, you note your daily trek to work is littered with tents alongside busy footpaths. A sizable homeless population is now  occupying green spaces meant originally as reserves for public enjoyment,  having become makeshift outdoor emergency shelters for these  swiftly-erected tent cities- 40% of  which house low-income working families. The extreme class inequality is extraordinarily evident , and mortifying. Violent gangs and general thuggery now thrive in this space, as does other violent anti-social activity.  The accelerated rise  of single-parent families  in poorer communities,  in part from the expansion of the carceral state,  has become  both the new norm as well as the majority . An entire generation now is lost. As is your community, your city and your country...

If you gotten this far in to this article, you might find the entirety of this future-narrative a bit of a melodramatic  dystopian  exaggeration. Which is understandable, until you look northwest across the Pacific and  become aware of the fact ( as laid before you in  multiple links provided by the highlighted words within the sentence, below) that these near-apocalyptic scenarios are  occurring, in real  time. in a far away land about 11,000 kilometers from our shores....

A dying republic called the United States


The Two-Headed Chris, A village missing its idiot, and The  Green bewilderedness

Chris Hipkins is essentially a left-over: the remnants of a once uber  centralist-liberal dream that disintegrated, retreating back to its mediocre roots after outsized influence largely from  it's response to Covid. And just like its charismatic orator and last benefactor,  Jacinda Ardern, who pretended to be a democratic socialist,  Labour pretends to be a robustly progressive tent,  but these three collectively have always  been centrist with corporate leanings.  Left-over  Hipkins, whose profile raised surreptitiously after advising folks to 'spread their legs ' during lockdown, saw his profile raised exponentially when Ardern split the scene to Cambridge, Massachusetts  (to feast on fellowship monies provided by the American  criminal corporate  1%  through their  one-time slave-owning ivy league university) , has been less than spectacular. This is not a dig on the ginger gent's lack of strong presence, but more on his lack of substance. 'In it for you;' has about as much sincerity as a campaign slogan as a gossip columnist swearing they don't engage in blackmail of their celebrity prey du jour, no matter how high the bounty. This is him trying to put some 'Hip" into his namesake, and appear authentic before his constituents. His releasing of Labour's  9 point pledge  is a repackaging  of what the party has already has historically backed,  performed on ,  or promised previously, and does nothing to face expanding class inequality.

Hipkins himself, a product of New Zealand academia, has shown meddle as a man whom will fight for a cause he deems fit, such as when he was wrongfully arrested back in 1997 when protesting the  Tertiary Review Green Bill at Parliament. He has shown striking tenacity and a steady hand both in the Auckland Anniversary weekend flooding of 2023 and Cyclone Gabriel. There is no question he is built for crisis, and can manage adeptly, unlike his counterpart, Auckland's  mealy-mouthed, moribund and morally bankrupt mayor Wayne Brown who completely wilted in self-defensive postering when he couldn't manage his way through a paper bag, let alone a functional emergency response for a city under deluge. 

But it's Hipkins'  centrist position that is wholly destructive, as is it  not guided by conditions on the ground, nor guided by the understanding of the world in which New Zealand resides in at current.  Mental acuity to grasp the nature of what is causing the nation to fall further back socio- economically is not a strong suit he bares with any true command . A pragmatist always lacks peripheral  vison to enable full-spectrum view, especially when its comes to matters of nascent  corporate incongruity.  Under his stead, the uber-criminal syndicate of  Black Rock has been allowed to start sucking up capital for 'sustainable green projects', and has fortified its presence. For those sullied  by my identifying  BlackRock as a criminal organization as being capricious or conspiratorial , consider this:  they are owners of an electric company in  Maui, Hawaii, that mysteriously cut off power to Lahaina six hours before the  horrific fire that leveled only the poorest housing  and structures, and killing only the poorest residents in south Maui, sparing the multi-million dollar homes  and hotels in the area . The same organization whom pushed  Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron  of France to forcibly raise the  retirement age without an open referendum nor consideration of public debate which sparked  month's long protests throughout the country.  As further evidence of the monolithic chicanery this behemoth is involved in , just watch  a certified recruiter from the company explain their global ambitions...

Video Courtesy of: O'Keefe Media Group (OMG). 


Hipkins lacks the global 'street smarts' in staving off vulture capitalists who are itching to buy thier way into New Zealand' s fragile market  and wreck the place for their own profit. The allowance of BlackRock to come in  and establish itself is profoundly telling of the putative naiveté that  he himself, and many members of parliament have toward foreign investors intentions, particularly, American, British  & Chinese hedge funders and investment firms that are completely self-benefitting and devoid of any ethical standard of 'fair play', no longer in service in creating new wealth for clients, but expanding wealth for themselves solely even if it means creating a  language that communicates environmental concerns they have no intention of meaningfully participating in. 

All the while, The Ardern/ Hipkins  led Labour continued shutting out and down migrants during CoVid, and leaving them to return to unsafe ramparts of nefarious  origins whilst allowing the likes of the DIA to manipulate away needed benefits they had temporarily been given unprecedented qualified access to receive, and allowing a toadie to run Immigration New Zealand into the ground

As a consequence,  Hipkins and Labour over the last 5 years have let the wolves into the parlour. 

The other Chris, Mr. Luxon , former MP of Botany is a  political- corporate creature unabashedly representing the interests of the managerial class. Having attain the heights of  CEO of Unilever in Toronto, Canada by way of Chicago, U.S. at the tender age of 38. C-Lux's  exposure the grand heights of capitalism during his time in North America left  in him an indelible mark. Having been born into a Roman Catholic family where Dad was a sales exec for Johnson & Johnson and his mother a psychotherapist gave  him  the kind of access to better schooling and opportunities that only this background can offer  through  disparity of access via inequality that is the Capitalist Way:  The Winners & Losers ,  of which he was on the winning side. In  recent years, this attribute would express itself through his  having no interest in allowing livable wages for workers during his time with Air New Zealand, and no care about curtailing malfeasance from investor toxicity.

If any one government is ready to show BlackRock and other 'foreign investors' some love, it's Luxon- homelessness by suffocating  housing unaffordability, rising food insecurity, wage deflation and recidivism be damned.... Cone on in boys! Lets Do This! 

His continuous roll-out of embarrassing policies wholly lacking in self-awareness, such as the youth rental bond initiative, his pretentious defense that his tax deferment policy of the upper class  will benefit the economy and curtail poverty, while leaving a $2 billion dollar hole to shore up fiscal appropriation,  and his sallow, vague  pulp being the National Party 8 point plan   is a strong showing  of what an empty suit he is. C-Lux's refusal to consider capital gains and luxury tax, in turn a blatant refusal to make the upper 10% pay their share, is demonstrative of  his obtuse self-interest and inane indifference to the current state of iniquity being experienced by the middle and lower working class in New Zealand. A view that Hipkins also holds , expressing his own naive lack of vision, backbone, and passivity in the matter

The debate that took place between these two bricks of the establishment wall on the 19th of September in Auckland  for mass media consumption and soundbytes,  only further fomented that both are actually the  same: neo-liberal centrists with no handle on the inequality that both their parties contribute due to ineffectual policies. The Ardern/ Hipkins camp, although brilliantly guiding the nation through the first 18 months of the pandemic, have done little else,  being nothing more than  mere custodians of polity for  oncoming corporate interest heading into the country. Chris Luxon's post-Key National Party was the party who single-handedly allowed New Zealand's credit rating  with Standard and Poor's and Fitch Group to fall through the floor during their last reign. The same National Party always willing to cut the social  safety net away from the most vulnerable to appease their criminal foreign investor  friends, which in turn, set in motion the current landscape of intense disparity the likes this country has not seen.

Although Hipkins did mop up the floor with Luxon's face using confirmed facts and figures verses Luxons  shallow and repetitive use of sloganeering  masquerading as legitimate expression of policy, the debate was as hollow as wingbone: light and breezy, pseudo substantive and  inflective performative theatre. A mere artifice of placative entertainment not meant to put genuine resolve into action. The more dangerous bits was Luxon's commitment to ban gang patches ( a form of censorship) and  the  allowance of expansion of large  tech companies into New Zealand , a problematic proposition given their dubious history

Further concerning was both candidates commitment to criminalizing 'hate speech', another form of censorship which part of a much larger issue involving  global oligarchical control over the masses

ACT's David Seymour has been reduced to just being comedy relief, and while  I could prattle on as to the wonderment of his vacuous existence, and the  ACT party being the mirror of the  violent, empty heads that occupy American House Freedom Caucus as well, I'll let John Campbell 'hold the mic and spit this'  as his 'bars are phat'. I will say his misinformed  and boisterous musings make  for great entertainment. My favourite moment of anti-intellectual rumblings was when he was debating Chloe Swarbrick on NewsHub AM about how to best approach the uptick in criminal activity since CoVID. While she  was coherently laying her argument against harsher penalties for young offenders with verified facts and figures in relation to a solution that can be effective , he could only bellow superlative hyperbole " We just need strong sentencing!! New Zealand has become a third world country!!". Somewhere out amongst the countryside, a village is truly missing its idiot...


And this idiot and his party might have enough to get the 61 seats necessary to make a majority coalition with National...

 

The Greens, outside of Chloe Swarbrick, however,  are  hyper-focused on environmental impacts like climate change initiatives,  de-carbonization, implementation of alternative fuels, and overall improvement to food and water purity. They  do not, however,  address class inequality. 

A green bewilderment.

Not addressing class inequality as the primary crisis makes other 'green initiatives' absolutely unattainable and without solid structural base to enact. Put simply, if people are too broke to manage sustaining what they need  to live properly, they will not have time nor care to meaningfully pursue these matters with any brevity.  Without the leverage of equality, the environment will continue to suffer. Being participatory in the facade of 'green initiatives' enacted by multinational corporations is not only naive in itself, but is also superficial as such entities only care about profit, and will sell a captive audience anything they wish to hear, so as  to continue raping foreign lands globally of resources unencumbered. The Greens are the one party that can cease this activity in totality. They need to discontinue the mixed-messaging and focus first on driving back Capitalism-induced poverty, pay  disparity, and the speculatory-driven  housing prices and rents . No other party in Aotearoa  can or will do it. They should also force Labour's hand to start moving in that space from a policy context

This is assuming Labour even comes back to majority or coalition rule in parliament . They may not...

New Zealand voters collectively  are moving toward a "Lesser of Two Evils" approach this cycle, one that does not work. I know this intimately because I am American by birthright, and I have seen this movie before. Voting alone will not yield the change of course of class inequality. It will worsen, and as a result recidivism will rise in tandem with criminal activity, especially among the young. Gang membership , collectively at around 8,900 strong in New Zealand, is growing faster in membership than the rate of newly hired and trained police officers, which currently stand at around 10,000 . Illicit activity will draft new recruits into the gangs as other assessable  resources  are reduced and curtailment of upward mobility continues to exert pressure and the most vulnerable- the working lower class/ unemployed  poor.

One Last Point...

Labour, National, ACT, and NZ First are complete  centrist garbage as a collective. Green Party is ineffective unless  it has majority coalition with itself at the lead, and this is would  only be erstwhile if Ms. Swarbrick can get the other  enviro-obsessed members to start focusing on class inequality, as that  is where 'all the bodies are buried'.  

There is no danger of the Greens forming a new majority coalition government in October  according to the current poles. I have a better chance at winning the lotto

New Zealande voters themselves need to take stock in their neighbours wellbeing, irrespective of differing  political leanings. We are part of the 'rest of the world' in the severity of the circumstances we find ourselves in.  If you need any evidence to suggest the plausible outcome of not bettering our neighbours and ourselves to a  more equal footing  through living wage and reasonable cost of living, if you still  view Capitalism as  all good, and becoming wealthy off the backs of others means your 'special', I would like to re-direct your attention as evidence to this place 11,000km northwest of here..

A dying republic called the United States